Likewise the Spirit helps us in our weakness. For we do not know what to pray for as we ought, but the Spirit himself intercedes for us with groanings too deep for words. And he who searches hearts knows what is the mind of the Spirit, because the Spirit intercedes for the saints according to the will of God. (Romans 8:26-27)

pentecostI was saved within the Holiness tradition before moving toward the Baptist denomination and heard this verse quoted often in adding validity to the ecstatic speech the church members were doing. The problem is that this passage (Romans 8) is not about spiritual gifts and, more specifically, it is not about speaking in tongues. The burden of the text is that the Spirit counterbalances the handicap of believers in prayer by interceding for them in accordance with God’s will. The hope of believers is also strengthened by the assistance of the Holy Spirit. Two scholars disagree on the passage and whether or not Paul encodes a statement about tongues. Is Romans 8:26-27 about tongues? Renowned New Testament scholar Gordon Fee argues in the affirmative for the following reasons: (1) the language corresponds with praying in/with the Spirit in other passages, (2) silent prayer was unheard of in the 1st century,  (3) a reference to tongues explains how the Spirit groans and we groan as well, (4) the term ἀλαλήτοις may also mean that which is uttered is without words and would be ineffable,  (5) groaning must involve audibility,  (6) we cannot understand the content of the prayer yet the Spirit can, and (7) the only common experience in the early church that fits this experience is tongues.

wsdrdfghArguing for the other side, New Testament scholar Thomas Schreiner disagrees for the following reasons: (1) Fee’s interpretation of what ἀλαλήτοις means is rather implausible, (2) στεναγμοῖς (the word for groaning) is probably not meant literally, and (3) the fact that all believers do not speak in tongues speaks against Fee’s interpretation. The groanings are the inexpressible longings that arise in every believer’s heart to do and know the will of God. Concerning point two, to find the gift of “tongues” because “groaning” is akin to what Charismatics and Pentecostals experience would require jumping through some interpretive loops. The idea of groaning within you is also found in the gospels where twice Jesus groaned within his spirit (John 11:33, 38). It is the experiential despair that creates the existential sigh within the soul of the righteous. Within the passage, there are three entities groaning: Creation, the believer and the Spirit. They’re all “groaning” because sin has affected Creation in such a way that pain, evil and disaster have befallen God’s good earth. The groaning of the Spirit no more has to be “tongues” within the passage anymore than the Creation’s groaning have to be that specific gift. Douglas Moo agrees with Schreiner remarking that “I take it that Paul is saying, then, that our failure to know God’s will and consequent inability to petition God specifically and assuredly is met by God’s Spirit, who himself expresses to God those intercessory petitions that perfectly match the will of God. When we do not know what to pray for—yes, even when we pray for things that are not best for us—we need not despair, for we can depend on the Spirit’s ministry of perfect intercession on our behalf.”

Schreiner’s last point is likely the most damaging to Fee’s interpretation. The Holy Spirit sovereignly gives spiritual gifts to His people and all of the gifts are equal (1 Cor. 12:4-11). He gives them for the edification of the body. 1 Corinthians 12:11 says thatAll these (the gifts) are empowered by one and the same Spirit, who apportions to each one individually as he wills.” Believers do not all have the same gift or access to one specific gift. The apostle asks in verse 30 “Do all possess gifts of healing? Do all speak with tongues? Do all interpret?” The answer to the rhetorical question is no. This has bearing for how we interpret the Romans 8 passage. Why would Paul appeal to the experience of the gift of tongues to encourage believers that might not have that specific gift? Speaking in tongues is a phenomenon found within the early church (1 Cor. 12-14; Acts 2) but it is best to not see tongues within this specific pericope.

8 responses to “Is Romans 8:26-27 a Passage about Speaking in Tongues?”

  1. Well I have experienced groainings twice and it is beyond words. And I don’t have the gift of tongues I have the gift of prophecy. I love Jesus and he loves me. Its wonderful not being a slave to sin anymore!

  2. While you make some attempt to critique Gotdon Fees argument for viewing speaking in tounges as referenced in Romans 8:26,you fail to actually be convincing. In Gordon Fee argues in 1 Corinthians 12 and 14 that the gift of “diversity of tounges” of which Paul asks “Do all speak…” is in reference to the public use of tounges within an assembly and not in reference to the private prayer tounges which is explained in 1Corinthians 14. My point is that if Gordon Fee is to be critiqued the whole argument needs to be weighed. As an anthropologist I find Fees strongest argument in that ancient read and prayed alound and not silently nor inwardly….which is a modern development.
    Upon a personal observation and opinion that many Christians dont speak in tounges it maybe more to do with this factor than any spiritual lack. They just do not vocalize the utteraces in their mind and spirits as they pray.

  3. While you make some attempt to critique Gotdon Fees argument for viewing speaking in tounges as referenced in Romans 8:26,you fail to actually be convincing. Gordon Fee argues in 1 Corinthians 12 and 14 that the gift of “diversity of tounges” of which Paul asks “Do all speak…” is in reference to the public use of tounges within an assembly and not in reference to the private prayer tounges which is explained in 1Corinthians 14. My point is that if Gordon Fee is to be critiqued the whole argument needs to be weighed. As an anthropologist I find Fees strongest argument in that ancients read and prayed aloud and not silently nor inwardly….which is a modern development.
    Upon a personal observation and opinion why many Christians dont speak in tounges it maybe more to do with this factor than any spiritual lack. They just do not vocalize the utteraces in their mind and spirits as they pray.

  4. Ken, I appreciate your response to this issue, however, you cannot use personal experience as the arbiter to validate your view of a passage, because that is too subjective. Another person can say “I’ve never had the experience of speaking in tongues, so based upon that – tongues does not exist. Then it’s your experience against theirs. We must validate everything based upon the Word of God – not experience.

  5. “is probably not meant literally,” and the ENTIRE argument against tongues shattered in ONE word=Probably

    1. Hey Jed,

      I recommend digging into Schreiner’s commentary if you want his exegetical reasoning behind the “probably” above.

  6. Good, well-written article. I don’t agree with you though on several points. Nowhere in 1 cor 12:4-11 does it say anything about the gifts being equal only that they are given by the same Spirit. Paul says it is “better to prophesy” he wants that gift more because it is better for the whole not just for individual edification. In response to the rhetorical questions Paul asks in 1 Cor 12 I would say you’re correct to interpret it that way the questions are rhetorical and not everyone has all of the gifts but they can be also be transferred through impartation and

    “Why would Paul appeal to the experience of the gift of tongues to encourage believers that might not have that specific gift?”

    This is actually a really good question and if it was coming from someone who is skeptical not just cynical I would answer it thusly:

    some would argue that there are different operations or functions of the gift specifically the gift of tongues which I will not go into here but if anyone is interested here is where you can find additional information

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0fN92Q9dnE

    1. I think Mr. Hernandez’s categorization of tongues into three uses of the gift is artificial. Tongues are a tough think to figure out biblically. Concerning the gift of tongues, there are at least five views held among evangelicals today: 1) tongues as angelic speech, 2) tongues as the miraculous power to speak other languages, 3) tongues as liturgical, archaic, or rhythmic phrases, 4) tongues as ecstatic speech, and 5) tongues as language of the unconscious released in sighs too deep for words. For more information see Anthony C. Thiselton, The First Epistle to the Corinthians: A Commentary on the Greek Text (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000), 970-988. Wayne A. Grudem says, “Tongues are “spiritually-inspired utterances that are unintelligible to the speaker without an interpretation. (598)” You’re right though, there are greater “gifts” according to Paul. He argues intelligibility when the church s gathered is of paramount importance. Uninterpreted tongues, therefore, doesn’t edify the Body.

Leave a comment

Trending